On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:09:56AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > The values reported by the delay call has been verified by using one GPIO as a > signal, and printout from the kernel at the same time with the delay, than > based on the time scale on the scope several (>100) cases has been hand > calculated and the results were compared to the kernel reported values. > The difference were around (or less) the 10 samples, but during the bursts it > is much harder to count, but the reported value was reasonable accurate there > as well. All these look good to me. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel