Re: USB transfer_buffer allocations on 64bit systems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9 April 2010 19:09, Daniel Mack <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 12:01:27PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
>> On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Pedro Ribeiro wrote:
>> > here is the output of the patch you sent me when the interference is triggered.
>> >
>> > The log is long, 1.3mb in size.
>>
>> I don't see anything suspicious.  The transfer_buffer addresses repeat
>> every 32 URBs, and the DMA addresses cycle almost entirely uniformly
>> from 0x20000000 to 0x23ffffff in units of 0x2000 (there are a few gaps
>> where the interval is a little bigger).
>
> The DMA pointers do indeed look sane. I wanted to take a deeper look at
> this and set up a 64bit system today. However, I fail to see the problem
> here. Pedro, how much RAM does your machine have installed?
>
> Daniel
>
>

It has 4 GB.

Pedro
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel


[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux