On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 07:54:22PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 07:39:58PM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote: > > Thanks! I assume this is going to be taken for .34 and .35? > > I've applied it for 2.6.35 only at present, I'd rather let it cook for a > little before picking it back - like you I can only test a limited set > of architectures. Unfortunately it doesn't cherry pick backwards > either, but the updates required do appear to be trivial. Agreed. However, I believe when pushed to .34, it will get greater exposion, and regressions would more likely be found and get fixed. Faster than in your for-2.6.35 branch I mean. Daniel _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
