Re: question on dapm_reg_event()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 09:10:27PM -0500, Haojian Zhuang wrote:

> I just have a question on dapm code. In dapm_reg_event(), -(w->reg +
> 1) is input parameter of snd_soc_update_bits(). Why we need to use
> negative value as input parameter at here? Why do we not use w->reg at
> here?

Hrm, no, that's not at all clear to me either.  CCing Jarkko who
contributed the register write control originally.
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux