Hi, On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 03:23:14AM +0100, ext Candelaria Villareal, Jorge wrote: >Is this because if two interrupts were set, my approach would >not recognize it as one of the cases and exit without processing >the interrupt? you don't have a break in your switch. your approach would go through all irq cases no matter what :-p >> what ? so even if you don't have a platform_device you register the >> driver ?? > >So, it would be better if I had declared a platform_device structure >in .../arch/arm/plat-omap/devices.c, and register its resources (irq >and memory base) in there? IMO yeah. It would look cleaner. But McBSP is the same mess so I don't know what the ALSA people will say. Jarkko Nikula probably has some ideas as he did most of the OMAP ASoC implementation. -- balbi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
