Sascha Hauer wrote: > Mainly because I wasn't aware of the fact that the fsl driver is the > same:( So "fsl-ssi.c" was not a clue? :-) > > I'm currently looking if and how the code can be merged. I don't know if > it's worth it though since the common code doesn't seem to be very big. That's probably because my driver only supports I2S and yours supports AC97. Please, DMA is different. I wasn't really expecting you to be able to re-use my driver, but I figured you could at least re-use the macros I've defined in fsl-ssi.h > There will have to be some changes in the fsl-ssi driver. For example I > need the irq handler for my fiq handler which means that the fsl-ssi > driver is not allowed to request the irq for it's statistic. That shouldn't be a problem, since the statistics never show anything useful anyway. > The other > thing is the hardware accesses as we do not have in_be*, out_be* and > setbits/clrbits. Of course all these things are doable and shouldn't be > a showstopper. These should be defined in the arch/arm header files anyway. -- Timur Tabi Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
