At Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:24:27 +0100 (CET), Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > At Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:06:57 +0100 (CET), > > Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Takashi Iwai wrote: > >> > >>> IOW, I'm fine with an additional implementation for the dynamic beep > >>> on/off. But, the mixer interface doesn't look like the best interface > >>> to me. > >> > >> I would prefer something which is comfortable for user. The module > >> parameter or sysfs file is not a good way to explain users how they can > >> change the beep behaviour. > > > > A module parameter would be easy enough for most users who really care > > things like beep :) > > Nope. You expect that all users knows how to change module parameters. I'm > sorry, but I'm lazy to explain in bugzilla many times, how to change the > kernel module parameter (it's enough to explain model= for HDA). But 'turn > off "Beep" in alsamixer or any ALSA-aware mixer app' is quite shorther and > intuitive. But because of this "easy-to-use", the switch can be soo easily changed unintentionally. So, we are speaking roughly the same thing of both good and bad sides. And here I'm more concerned about the bad side than the good side. thanks, Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
