Hi David, On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 06:35:05PM +0800, David Härdeman wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 05:06:22PM +0800, David Härdeman wrote: > >> On Thu, November 5, 2009 08:47, Wu Fengguang wrote: > >>> > >>> Attached is my updated patchset, which includes the sticky > >>> stream/infoframe features. > >> > >> Thanks, I'll take a look at it as soon as possible. > > I've read through the latest set of patches you sent me and also compiled > a kernel using them. The patches look good and work great (save for the > fact that I still have a 0.2s silence, but it's still a big improvement). > I'd be happy to see them go upstream :) Thank you :) You mean 0.2s silence, not 0.2s lost of audio samples? I'd say you have smart ears :) Did you compared the playback over HDMI vs over legacy audio and feel the silence at start of HDMI stream? > On a related note, I still think the only way to get a really flawless > playback on my picky receiver is to implement some kind of "silentstream" > as mentioned earlier (since then I've also tried messing with VCFG and V, > but it seems to upset my receiver even more than complete silence since it > will take even longer to provide sounds once audio starts flowing again). > > Some other drivers seem to support it (though implemented via hardware > specific means), one example: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-radeonhd/commit/?id=422ac06b69cfcbfbaa802fdc916d3b87f40eeb41 > > Do you think you could ask your colleagues at Intel to explain how they've > implemented silentstream in the windows driver? Hmm, I'm not sure if it would be possible. I'll check it. Thanks, Fengguang _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
