On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 11:19:54AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Mark Brown > >> > It occurs to me that in terms of dealing with what's going on here this >> > probably is achieving exactly the same effect as Jon's code in that it >> > tells ALSA that things are a bit ahead of where the buffer started. > >> Possibly, but I can both reproduce and eliminate the problem Jon is >> seeing regardless of whether or not this patch, so I'm not yet >> convinced. > > That doesn't entirely surprise me; I'm not convinced that the original > approach entirely deals with the issue rather than just making it much > harder to see. Indeed. I'm at the point where I'm far more interested in achieving "correctness" than trying to hobble together a set of conditions that appears to work most of the time. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
