On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote: > At Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:05:15 -0600, > Robert Hancock wrote: >> >> I've been using the VT1828S codec support from ALSA git for the last few >> weeks. It seems to work fine, but there are some problems showing up in >> dmesg: >> >> Oct 25 20:46:14 newcastle kernel: ALSA sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c:683: No >> response from codec, disabling MSI: last cmd=0x02af0900 >> Oct 25 20:46:15 newcastle kernel: ALSA sound/pci/hda/hda_intel.c:698: >> azx_get_response timeout, switching to polling mode: last cmd=0x02af0900 > > Note that this isn't always a severe problem. If polling mode works > (you don't see the similar errors after this), it means the IRQ isn't > properly generated at verb handling. > >> It seems like the cmd isn't always the same, previously it was >> 0x024f0c00. Is there something bad about this command that could be >> causing the response timeout? > > Hm, both aren't really same, pointing to different widgets. So, > it looks like a generic problem in the codec communication on your > board. Something VIA guys should look into? > >> Also, disabling MSI for one occurrence of >> this seems a bit paranoid.. > > MSI was unstable for long time, so disabling it was a sane option :) > Now it gets better, so it should be a second option. > I changed the code now. > >> Also saw one of these: >> >> Oct 26 21:13:20 newcastle kernel: hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is >> activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj. >> >> and PulseAudio also complained: >> >> Oct 26 00:27:50 newcastle pulseaudio[16530]: alsa-sink.c: ALSA woke us >> up to write new data to the device, but there was actually nothing to write! >> Oct 26 00:27:50 newcastle pulseaudio[16530]: alsa-sink.c: Most likely >> this is a bug in the ALSA driver 'snd_hda_intel'. Please report this >> issue to the ALSA developers. >> Oct 26 00:27:50 newcastle pulseaudio[16530]: alsa-sink.c: We were woken >> up with POLLOUT set -- however a subsequent snd_pcm_avail() returned 0 >> or another value < min_avail. > > Well, this is the case where the hardware reports bad position data. > This is usually a hardware bug, and hard to fix properly. We have some > mechanism to correct or take back to the last position. This should > usually work, but apparently not in your case... Well, it looks like PulseAudio complained before the IRQ timing workaround was activated (about 20 hours earlier).. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel