On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 01:17:52PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > On Tuesday 27 October 2009 13:07:23 Nurkkala Eero.An (EXT-Offcode/Oulu) wrote: > > You may wish to double read the message above, as it's quite > > confusing =) > Yes it is ;) > I have left one spinlock around the dma_op_mode, when it also protects the > mcbsp->active, so that is why that last sentence. I have to confess that I'm still not entirely clear what the lock is supposed to be doing or why it's OK to drop it. I gather that it's just that dmap_on_mode() doesn't need a lock at all? _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
