On 10/21/2009 2:00 PM, Barry Song wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Mark Brown > <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:13:19PM +0800, Barry Song wrote: >> >> No new text? > :-) > Just feel strange why s3c64xx-i2s.c/.h for s3c64xx soc are placed into > s3c24xx directory since s3c24xx can't cover s3c64xx. > There are 3 plat-xx in arch/arm: > plat-s3c/ plat-s3c24xx/ plat-s3c64xx/ > and several mach-s3cxx in arch/arm: > mach-s3c2400/ mach-s3c2410/ mach-s3c2412/ mach-s3c2440/ mach-s3c2442/ > mach-s3c6410/... > All these show those SoCs are equal. > > Is it the time to rename sound/soc/s3c24xx/ to sound/soc/s3c or move > s3c64xx stuff to sound/soc/s3c64xx/? > I think there is no need to move the directory because it is just the naming problem. Also it can be added other the samsung cpus like s5pc1xx in s3c24xx directory, so we will need the proper other name instead of s3c24xx. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
