Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:10:44 +0200, > Guillem Solà wrote: > >> Takashi Iwai wrote: >> >>> It shows the address 1. So, my patch doesn't work, as it assumes >>> address 0. Replace it with 1, and pass probe_mask=0x02. >>> >>> >>> Takashi >>> >>> >>> >> Yeah great, it's working again! >> >> I did modprobe snd-hda-intel probe_mask=0x03 instead of mask=0x02 to >> make it work >> >> and the patch let this way ( I changed both return 1 and addr=1) >> > > Now the question is whether probe_mask=0x03 (or 0x02) works without > this patch. How is it? > > > thanks, > > Hi, after few tests I can conclude that it could work with and without the patch. The same happens with modprobe snd-hda-intel probe_mask=0x03 or 0x02 both can work. So it seems to be fickle because not all the times you modprobe the intel module it worked. regards Guillem Solà _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
