On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Thanks. This looks really incompatible with the existing VIA codecs. >> > So, no wonder that you didn't get it working by a simple hack. >> >> Yes, I agree. >> >> > Harald, do you know anyone who can help the development for this new >> > codec chip? >> >> VIA already has code for supporting this chip, and they were about to support >> one big monster patch (15000 lines of code) containing what looks like several >> months of code for several codecs. > > OK, good to know. > >> I've asked them to split this up and create >> and submit per-feature patches. > > Ah, thanks, that'll be really helpful! > >> I don't know how long it will take them to do this. Maybe Lydia can give >> some comment on this. >> >> Also, in case you want to see the big monster patch just for reference, I >> can see if it can be posted to alsa-devel. It should be no problem, IMHO. > > Heh, who wants it? ;) > The logically split patches are really appreciated, especially in such > a case. If it's possible, I'd say it would be nice to have the big patch posted now even if it's not in mergeable condition yet, just for testing and for people to use temporarily.. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
