At Thu, 3 Sep 2009 17:26:18 +0200, Giovanni Maruzzelli wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Giovanni > Maruzzelli<gmaruzz.lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I'll do it and report > > > > I put hrtimer=0 > > I put the printk immediately after the spin_unlock, just before > return, this is a some second run (gave me bad behavior, as before, > maybe worst): > > Sep 3 17:20:20 localhost kernel: giovanni line: 291, dpcm->frac_pos / > HZ=0, jiffies=91837395 > Sep 3 17:20:20 localhost kernel: giovanni line: 291, dpcm->frac_pos / > HZ=48, jiffies=91837398 > Sep 3 17:20:20 localhost kernel: giovanni line: 291, dpcm->frac_pos / > HZ=48, jiffies=91837398 > Sep 3 17:20:20 localhost kernel: giovanni line: 291, dpcm->frac_pos / > HZ=80, jiffies=91837400 > Sep 3 17:20:20 localhost kernel: giovanni line: 291, dpcm->frac_pos / > HZ=80, jiffies=91837400 So, this is a kernel with the variable HZ. That's the whole problem. My patch also doesn't take it into account but assumes the constant HZ. We'll need to convert the stuff to msecs_to_jiffies() and co... Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
