On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:42 PM, MarkBrown<broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:> On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 10:37 +0800, Barry Song wrote:>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Mark>> Brown<broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:>>> > Yup, that DSP mode with I2S like channel layout (does it also do TDM in>> > I2S mode by any chance?). Could you submit a version of your patch>> > which uses the default TDM layout - an API to rewrite things is likely>> > to be a separate API?>>> I don't know what is your exact meaning. Do you mean I send a patch>> whose tdm slot is not changed, then send a patch which change the tdm>> slot?>> Send a patch that allows selection of the active slots without rewriting>Sorry. I am not sure about your meaning yet. The problem is the slotorder, the match between slot number and channel number, not onlywhich slot is active, and which is not active. > Although thinking about it I'm not sure if the driver is actually> implementing TDM or not - does the CPU actually get configured to stop> driving the data line during an inactive slot (so something else can> drive it) or is it simply sending zeros on those slots? It's the later. The hardware signal is still active but no valid datain inactive slot.>>_______________________________________________Alsa-devel mailing listAlsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
