Sunday 23 August 2009 20:05:43 Mark Brown wrote: > If none of your patches have been applied Mark, I did not say that. You have applied patches 2/3 [1] and 3/3 [2] from the series. > then what are the other > patches that depend on this? Nobody reported any issues in testing with > the other OMAP patches. Dependency on patch 1/3 is not compile time, but run time, and OMAP1510 specific, that's probably why nobody has reported any issues. > I don't really mind which tree these go via but I rather suspect that > ALSA will be better given all the other changes and I also suspect that > you'll need to regenerate your changes against a current tree due to > those changes. arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c has not been touched since 2009-05-28 in yours [3] and since 2009-06-23 in Takashi's tree, so my patch, whether original or v2, should still be up to date. That may change if it is to be pushed via OMAP tree. Sorry for all that noise. Thanks, Janusz [1]http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound-2.6.git;a=commit;h=64844a6ac8ddd586cb832fea7cf2e93e5e7e03f4 [2]http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound-2.6.git;a=commit;h=471e3dec3abe2d41e8c742046353fcb01bc2459e [3]http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound-2.6.git;a=commit;h=44169075e6eaa87bab6a296209d8d0610879b394 [4]http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound-2.6.git;a=commit;h=aecedb94b366d6fb5e2a17ca18a5dc78e593198e _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
