On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:46:34PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Mark > Brown<broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> + gpio_request(GPIO_FN_FSIMCKA, NULL); > > Is this something that the FSI driver should do for itself? It looks > > like there's no pin options here, just fixed functions for FSI A or B so > > replicating per-board seems redundant. On the other hand, if it's > > idiomatic for SH better keep it this way. > These GPIO_FN_ values are processor specific, sh7724 in this case. I > suspect we will see the FSI block reused in future processors so > keeping processor-specific bits out of the driver itself may be a good > plan. Long term I'd be more than happy to pass along processors > specific GPIOs to each driver, but at this point I don't know any > clean and standard way to do that. Is it possible to build kernels for more than one processor? The way the code looks that's not the case... _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
