On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 07:05:54PM -0700, Troy Kisky wrote: > This is allocated too late for the "ensure that buffer size is a multiple of period size" > constraint. > I have a patch after fixing other feedback. It looks good to me - I've no issues with the patch except for the one I mentioned last time about considering ignoring the data in SRAM when reporting the current position but I'm happy either way. The patch will run into the cross tree issues with the platform data like the channel combining one, probably best to submit patches against Kevin's tree for now (or wait until after the merge window). Have you tested with PulseAudio? If not it'd be worth giving it a spin - it's one of the more demanding applications. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
