Re: [PATCH] [RFC 8/13] Intel SST sound card driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




>-----Original Message-----
>From: Takashi Iwai [mailto:tiwai@xxxxxxx]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 12:19 PM
>To: Harsha, Priya
>Cc: Koul, Vinod; alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re:  [PATCH] [RFC 8/13] Intel SST sound card driver
>
>At Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:50:46 +0530,
>Harsha, Priya wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >> +	.access 	=	SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_READWRITE,
>> >> +	.info 		=	snd_intelmad_line_volume_info,
>> >> +	.get 		=	snd_intelmad_volume_get,
>> >> +	.put		=	snd_intelmad_volume_set,
>> >
>> >Can it have the dB information via TLV?
>> No. It actually differs across the 3 sound cards supported and it's
>> not a direct TLV that can be used.
>
>Then you'd set a static TLV entry after creating the ctl element
>instance, or return a TLV entry dynamically via the tlv callback.
Sorry I misunderstood. The value that is passed in min and max is in dB. 
For min and max values, it's a static dB value that I return. But when the volume adjustments need to be done, based on the value given by ALSA, I set the sound card registers to reflect that dB value. When volume is queried for, I read the specific sound card register and return the dB value to ALSA.
Will this implementation be ok?

Thanks,
Harsha

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux