On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:08 PM, michael<michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > Grant Likely wrote: >> >> From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> AC97 bus register read/write hooks need to provide locking, but the >> mpc5200-psc-ac97 driver does not. This patch adds a mutex around >> the register access routines. >> >> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> >> sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.c | 1 + >> sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.h | 1 + >> sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_psc_ac97.c | 13 ++++++++++++- >> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> >> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.c b/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.c >> index efec33a..f0a2d40 100644 >> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.c >> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.c >> @@ -456,6 +456,7 @@ int mpc5200_audio_dma_create(struct of_device *op) >> return -ENODEV; >> spin_lock_init(&psc_dma->lock); >> + mutex_init(&psc_dma->mutex); >> psc_dma->id = be32_to_cpu(*prop); >> psc_dma->irq = irq; >> psc_dma->psc_regs = regs; >> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.h b/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.h >> index 2000803..8d396bb 100644 >> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.h >> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.h >> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ struct psc_dma { >> unsigned int irq; >> struct device *dev; >> spinlock_t lock; >> + struct mutex mutex; >> u32 sicr; >> uint sysclk; >> int imr; >> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_psc_ac97.c >> b/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_psc_ac97.c >> index 9b8503f..7eb5499 100644 >> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_psc_ac97.c >> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_psc_ac97.c >> @@ -34,11 +34,14 @@ static unsigned short psc_ac97_read(struct snd_ac97 >> *ac97, unsigned short reg) >> int status; >> unsigned int val; >> + mutex_lock(&psc_dma->mutex); >> + >> /* Wait for command send status zero = ready */ >> status = >> spin_event_timeout(!(in_be16(&psc_dma->psc_regs->sr_csr.status) & >> MPC52xx_PSC_SR_CMDSEND), 100, 0); >> if (status == 0) { >> pr_err("timeout on ac97 bus (rdy)\n"); >> + mutex_unlock(&psc_dma->mutex); >> return -ENODEV; >> > > maybe define an err variable and and a goto out. My first iteration did that, but after looking at it I decided I like this better and it adds (slightly) fewer lines of code. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel