On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 07:43 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:13:35 -0700, > Joe Perches wrote: > > diff --git a/sound/pci/ens1370.c b/sound/pci/ens1370.c > > index 18f4d1e..d589bbc 100644 > > --- a/sound/pci/ens1370.c > > +++ b/sound/pci/ens1370.c > > @@ -445,11 +445,11 @@ static irqreturn_t snd_audiopci_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id); > > > > static struct pci_device_id snd_audiopci_ids[] = { > > #ifdef CHIP1370 > > - { 0x1274, 0x5000, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0, }, /* ES1370 */ > > + { PCI_VDEVICE(ENSONIQ, 0x5000), 0, }, /* ES1370 */ > > #endif > > #ifdef CHIP1371 > > - { 0x1274, 0x1371, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0, }, /* ES1371 */ > > - { 0x1274, 0x5880, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0, }, /* ES1373 - CT5880 */ > > + { PCI_VDEVICE(ENSONIQ, 0x1371), 0, }, /* ES1371 */ > > + { PCI_VDEVICE(ENSONIQ, 0x5880), 0, }, /* ES1373 - CT5880 */ > > { 0x1102, 0x8938, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0, }, /* Ectiva EV1938 */ > > Any reason not to covert this? Not really, 0x1102 maps to 2 PCI entries, CREATIVE and ECTIVA. The script wouldn't know which is appropriate to use, so I skipped it. The script is in 0/19: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/25/21 _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel