Takashi Iwai wrote: > Thanks, applied now with a minor fix (reordering the entry). > > But, looking at the change, it might be that the entry 1046:1262 could > be a typo. It should be harmless, though :) > > Yes it's strange that the vendor ID seems different from one variant to another. BTW, is the 3rd parameter to the macro is used for DMI matching or is it just for informational purposes? Thanks, _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
