On Monday 18 May 2009 18:28:52 ext Aggarwal, Anuj wrote: > [Aggarwal, Anuj] I tried this on OMAP3 EVM. Ramp delay values 0-3 produces > minor glitches in the beginning & end, value 4 gave me the best result so > far on my EVM, I will try with some other EVMs as well before finalizing > it. 5 and others produce a beep in the beginning and end. Just one > question, is there any side-effect of choosing a large ramp delay? For e.g. > in my case, it could be 437ms (19.2MHz clock). It is less than half a second ;) I'm not sure, but we could try later to add a timer to finish up the ramp- down. There could be (not foreseen) side effects... At this point I think this (series) is a good start and it is better than what we had. BTW: I'll wait for the verdict on the series and I will send a fix for the Handsfree pop attenuation also. -- Péter _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
