On Thu, 14 May 2009 19:59:46 +0100, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This all looks basically fine - just a few comments below, the main one > being the way you're registering things. Thank you for quick review! > > +#define txx9aclc_ac97_suspend NULL > > +#define txx9aclc_ac97_resume NULL > > +#endif > > Just remove all this if there's no implementation. OK. I will do. > Ideally you'd be registering a platform device in your arch code and > then the DAI would only be registered when the device is probed. This > (and similar stuff for the DMA) would mean that... ... > ...all this resource stuff wouldn't need to be done by the machine > driver, it'd be done by your DAI and DMA drivers. That means less > duplication of code for multiple machines both in the machine driver and > in registering the resources along with the platform device. OK, then I will move irq/mem resource stuff to the DAI driver and dma resource stuff to the DMA driver. I placed them in the machine driver because both DAI and DMA drivers need the mem resource. I can move the mem resource stuff into the DAI driver since the DAI driver will be probed before the DMA driver. OTOH, I want to keep arch code as is. There are some TXx9 SoC variations and they can have different baseaddr/irq/dma. I want to leave these details in arch code and make ASoC drivers generic as possible. --- Atsushi Nemoto _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
