On Thursday 14 May 2009 15:53:34 ext Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 03:44:47PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > On Thursday 14 May 2009 12:56:21 ext Mark Brown wrote: > > > The event could check the current setup and do whatever's appropriate? > > > > I have to think about this, but at first sight it does look awfully > > complicated thing to do (4 PGA, 7 output with mixers, 2+1 output mux)... > > It might help to have the mixers and muxes maintain some state when they > change? It's just a suggestion, I'm not familiar enough with the codec > to know if it's a sensible one for this device or if it's more trouble > than it's worth. I have given this one a though and it might be not that problematic. What I'm afraid is that there are some corner cases, which might need some special attention. > > > I think I don't want to fixate the ramp delay to any value (meaning that > > the delay would last around 50ms). This seams to be also board specific, > > so I would rather leave this to the user to find the best value for the > > given board. > > Ah, right. Possibly worth making it platform data, I suppose, but > that'd be a pain when experimenting to find the values. In the future I can add platform data for the initial ramp delay value, which can be passed from the board file, but still the user will be able to change that if he/she wanted to. -- Péter _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
