On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 09:21:53AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 08:27:06AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 08:06:08PM -0300, Daniel Ribeiro wrote: > > > > The SPI subsystem? > > > Can the SPI system cope with the other chip being the master of the > > interface. In other words, can SPI sit around primed for a transfer, > > and notify the user of SPI that new data has arrived? > > > If not, the SPI subsystem is totally unsuitable for this. > > It's slave only at the minute - there's holes in the API someone could > fill in but that's not happened yet. Well, I guess someone else will have to do that; I don't spend much time on the LX stuff, and so if it requires any time consuming work, it won't be worth trying to get it into mainline. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
