On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Daniel Ribeiro <drwyrm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:> Em Ter, 2009-04-28 às 23:20 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux escreveu:>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 01:06:12PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote:>> > Actually, due to the number of possible SSP configurations, it's quite a>> > difficult job to maintain an API that can be well re-used. The guideline>> > here is to keep only a list of SSP devices and their basic information,>> > and it's up to the user driver (like SPI or Audio SSP) to configure the>> > SSP in a desired way.>>>> Hmm, the LX battery driver uses this API for its rudimentary battery>> communication channel with the PCON.>>>> What are you suggesting as the replacement API? Direct register access?>> The SPI subsystem?> Yeah, I looked into the patch a bit. It looks like the SSP configurationfalls into the SPI subystem quite well._______________________________________________Alsa-devel mailing listAlsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
