On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:50:01AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Does that patch need merging for 2.6.30 (you said I2S was broken)? > >> Grant and I are the only two active users of I2S and we're passing >> patches to each other. I don't have I2S completely fixed yet. > >> I'll post a series today that reorgs things to make my real patches > > If you're reorganising the code that's not really suitable for 2.6.30. > >> My real patches fix up i2s and implement ac97. > > It sounds like we need fixed I2S for 2.6.30 and then a 2.6.31 series > which does the reorganising and addition of AC97 support. The fixes have been implemented on top of the reorganized code. It is hard to review the fixes right now because no one has the reorganized base. Is there really a problem with sending the reorg in now? There are only two users of the code and we have both ack'd it. > -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
