On Apr 5, 2009, at 9:39 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Anton Vorontsov > <avorontsov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 11:59:39PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: >>> Becky & Kumar, >>> >>> Considering these fixups, would it be advisable for the dma >>> functions >>> to climb up the dev->parent linkage when dma_ops are NULL? >> >> pcm->dev->parent doesn't point to the proper device, so >> this won't work. > > What does it point to then? IIUC, following the ->parent links should > eventually get to a struct device that represents the platform or > of_platform device for purposes of power management. > > BTW, I'm not NAKing your patch. The patch looks fine to me. > > g. No, I think we should just fix drivers. There aren't that many SoC drivers and once they are fixed this will resolve itself. - k _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
