At Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:30:00 +0100,
Andreas Mohr wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 06:15:39PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:00:15 +0100,
> > Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 05:19:38PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > At Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:06:35 +0100,
> > > > 私 wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > > What are "sliders"?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Umm, volume level controls.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes but there are many of such :)
> > > > >
> > > > > More exactly, from the driver perspective, there are no volume
> > > > > controls but only there are control elements with integer values.
> > > > > Do you mean "Capture Volume" control or which one?
> > >
> > > Hmm, ok, this needs to be more precise:
> > > In gamix (codec "HDA Intel : Realtek ALC268"), the Capture Volume control.
> >
> > Yeah, that's more understandable :)
> >
> > BTW, does "Capture Volume" influence on the recording level even for
> > the built-in mic, right? I'm asking this because the digital mic on
> > STAC/IDT codecs isn't controlled via "Capture Volume" control that is
> > bound to an ADC widget. (That's why "Digital Capture Volume" control
> > exists. It's a value used by alsa-lib softvol plugin for "default"
> > PCM.)
>
> Yes, Capture Volume does influence i-Mic level.
> The Digital Capture control, however, doesn't influence level.
> As doesn't the Mic Boost Capture control (probably about e-Mic only?).
The "Digital Capture Volume" has effect only when "default" PCM is used.
If you record via "hw" or "plughw", it's unused.
> > > > > And, is the behavior consistent regardless of the value high, i.e.
> > > > > the key is only whether the values for both channels are identical?
> > > >
> > > > BTW, what if you record with the following definition?
> > > > Put the below to ~/.asoundrc
> > > >
> > > > pcm.imix {
> > > > type plug
> > > > slave.pcm "hw"
> > > > ttable.0.0 0.5
> > > > ttable.0.1 -0.5
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > and record like
> > > >
> > > > % aplay -Dimix -c1 foo.wav
> > >
> > > Does NOT exhibit the "equal sliders == no sound" bug (apart from this sliders
> > > are acting normally, i.e. slider low == no sound), despite being a
> > > "plug" type definition (this is what you wanted to discern, right? ;).
> >
> > Interesting. This implies that one channel is inverted indeed.
>
> Oh, you mean "inverted" as in "_hardware_ channel which provides opposite
> sample values as compared to the other channel"?
Right. My guess is that the hardware provides left (or right) channel
is multiplied by -1 (yep "inverted" is no correct word choice).
> > As default the alsa-lib plugin downmixes a stereo stream to a mono
> > stream simply by left/2 + right/2. The above changes the routing
> > policy as left/2 - right/2.
>
> That exactly matches my current stream of thought (while reading
> "one channel is inverted" above).
>
> > So we need to pass some information to change this kind of thing...
>
> That's something specific to ALC268 codec setup, right?
> ("ALC268 digital mic == left plus right channel, but inverted setup"?)
No. It's specific to the digital-mic side.
Takashi
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
