On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Kevin Hilman wrote: > > > > Ok, so the patch affecting sound/soc/davinci/davinci-evm.c SHOULD have > > been submitted to ALSA first. > > Yes, but it should've been a patch against an ASoC tree, not against > DaVinci git which may contain things not (yet) in the ASoC tree. > > > It is not easy following you guys. You say something and then do the > > opposite. > > Heh, sorry. > > Do as I do, not as I say. ;) I'd say "my bad" ... but in these cases there's seems to be no better solution than having the DaVinci GIT tree diverge a bit from mainline ASoC, in synchrony with arch/arm/mach-davinci which is also diverging from mainline. There's a general rule that patches should not break builds. And that rule is why there are several ASoC patches I've not yet sent to mainline. The whole ASoC/DaVinci thing has been nothing but build breakage however, since it depends on EDMA patches which haven't yet gone to mainline. (But, I believe, will soon do so, at which point that breakage will stop.) - Dave _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
