Re: Rationale behind snd_pcm_htimestamp()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 25.02.09 16:13, Takashi Iwai (tiwai@xxxxxxx) wrote:

> > Hmm, so I understood you correctly then the API would need changing to
> > get the timestamp, the delay and the avail value that belong together?
> 
> Yes, if you stick with snd_pcm_htimetamp(), snd_pcm_avil() and co.
> 
> But basically snd_pcm_status() does sync and fetch all status data.
> Shouldn't calling this suffice for your purpose?

Hmm, so snd_pcm_status() does sync? Good to know. I'll then use that.

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering                        Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net         ICQ# 11060553
http://0pointer.net/lennart/           GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux