On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > In reality this setting should not matter at all, because most machines > > should be fast enough to keep the buffer filled even if we write one > > sample at a time as it is done in the example. > > Not really. If you feed the output to a terminal, it's damn slow. > That's why I got XRUN. I figured this few seconds ago, too. It's the terminal output which makes XRUN. Jaroslav ----- Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxxx> Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer ALSA Project, Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
