On Mon, 23.02.09 20:20, Lennart Poettering (mznyfn@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Mon, 23.02.09 03:56, Lennart Poettering (mznyfn@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > Hmm, for now my little testing experiment I've now found es1969, > > ens1371, intel8x0, snd-emu10k1 and some intel-hda to have unreliable > > _avail() or _delay(). > > And here's the output for HDA STAC92xx: > > http://pastebin.mandriva.com/7149 > > The first dump is the interesting one: when audio starts to play the > buffer abruptly runs empty in just 20us after the device started. (The > rightmost column is the state btw, 3 == playing). > > A quick overview of cards where _delay() and/or _avail() are unreliable: > > es1969 > ens1371 > intel8x0 > emu10k1 > intel-hda on STAC92xx > intel-hda on AD1989B And here's another one, for intel-hda on ALC883: Sometimes snd_pcm_avail() returns values like 4611686018427387098. Smells like another overflow to me. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553 http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
