At Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:23:03 -0500, Matthew Ranostay wrote: > > Takashi Iwai wrote: > > At Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:39:43 -0500, > > Matthew Ranostay wrote: > >> @@ -334,7 +335,7 @@ static hda_nid_t stac92hd83xxx_slave_dig_outs[2] = { > >> }; > >> > >> static unsigned int stac92hd83xxx_pwr_mapping[4] = { > >> - 0x03, 0x0c, 0x20, 0x80, > >> + 0x03, 0x0c, 0x20, 0x40, > >> }; > > > > What is this change? > > > > > From my patch before I made a mistake, somehow I thought port 0xe was 0xf in that > change. Sorry for the inconvenience. Well, if it's needed to be fixed, please create another patch, since this change is basically independent from PWR_REF quirk. Or, at least, include some proper description in changelog. thanks, Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel