On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:40:41 +0000 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 04:17:00PM -0500, Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > > Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Sounds like that should be fixed instead, then? > > > If someone wants to fix it, fine. I tried but couldn?t find what is > > wrong. Maybe the person who added that piece of code (not me) should > > fix it... > > It was added by David Brownell to prevent the module being used on the > wrong hardware, which is perfectly reasonable. The machine_is_foo() > tests are a very standard part of the ARM infrastructure and are > widely used - if they're not working that's where the fix is. Are > you sure that your .config has MACH_SFFSDR set? There appears to be > no mainline support for the core machine so you'd have to have > patched that in... I just found the cause. I created the SFFSDR machine on the ARM website, and this automatically defined the macro CONFIG_MACH_SFFSDR, and not CONFIG_MACH_DAVINCI_SFFSDR like it is currently in the Kconfig. I will submit a patch to rename CONFIG_MACH_DAVINCI_SFFSDR to CONFIG_MACH_SFFSDR in the Kconfig file. Thank-you everyone for your help. Hugo. --------------- Hugo Villeneuve www.hugovil.com --------------- _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
