On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 09:53:21PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Are all these 2.6.30 material or for 2.6.29? They're a bit on the edge, I'd expect them to be safe for 2.6.29 but the conservative thing would be to punt to 2.6.30. None of them are critical. > For 2.6.30, I'll create another branch. It won't be included in > linux-next, too, until rc1 is reached (Stephen requested so), but we > can keep it in our main branch, of course. How about branching off a fixes branch for 2.6.29 rather than a -next branch? That way we can keep using the same branch for further fixes through the -rc series. Doesn't make much difference either way, though. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
