At Sun, 14 Dec 2008 11:52:29 +0100, Jean-Pierre André wrote: > > Hi Takashi, > > Takashi Iwai wrote: > > At Sat, 13 Dec 2008 12:41:23 +0100 (CET), > > Jean-Pierre ANDRE wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I am getting difficulty setting up ALSA for my new HP portable computer. > >> lspci displays the audio chip as : > >> Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 03) > >> and /proc/asound displays the codec as IDT 92HD71B7X > >> > >> I have uploaded the detailed hardware and configuration parameters to > >> http://pagesperso-orange.fr/b.andre/visits.html/92HD71B7X > >> > >> I am using Fedora 10 x86_64 without pulseaudio and with the latest alsa-driver : > >> alsa-driver-1.0.18a.16.g4012f.139.g6e583.tar.bz2 > >> > >> I have googled for a similar problem, but did not get to an actual fix, > >> the following thread appears to deal with a most similar situation : > >> http://forums.opensuse.org/pre-release-beta/399731-beta-5-no-sound.html > >> > >> After several tries, I have set modprobe.conf as > >> alias snd-card-0 snd-hda-intel > >> options sound slots=snd-hda-intel > >> options snd-hda-intel model=hp-m4 single_cmd=1 enable_msi=1 > >> > > > > Don't use single_cmd=1 option. If this is needed, it's already > > something very wrong, most likely a deeper problem like ACPI. > > > > > > Takashi > > > Thank you for your help. > > I had already tested without the single_cmd=1 option, and > the only difference I see is the " azx_get_response timeout, > switching to polling mode" warning. Switching to polling mode is OK and mostly harmless. But single_cmd is not. There is a VERY big difference between them. > Probably related is the > fact that I have never seen an IRQ 22. > > from proc/interrupts : > > 22: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb6, HDA Intel Hum, then it must be an interrupt thing. Ask rather ACPI guys. Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
