At Mon, 8 Dec 2008 10:29:05 +0100, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: > > On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 08:32:42 +0100 > Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > At Thu, 4 Dec 2008 15:29:47 +0100, > > Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Feel free to comment on the included patch. I had to add it because > > > aseqnet would not link without -lintl. > > > > Patching Makefile.in doesn't make any sense. > > > > I have quite low fu with autoconf, but sure Makefile.in does not need a > patch as well? There are no users of LIBADD in seq/aseqnet/Makefile.in. No, Makefile.in is created by Makefile.am. > > Does the patch below work instead? > > > > Nope, still not able to find libintl. Then something other is missing. > What is the correct way of testing this? From a fresh 1.0.18 source I > changed seq/aseqnet/Makefile.am and then ran autoreconf > before ./configure + make. Should I have used more/other autotools? No, it should work. Even without autoreconf, configure itself should check the change of Makefile.am. Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
