At Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:49:06 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:35:01PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > Mark Brown wrote: > > > > + return score; > > > > + return 0xffffffff; > > > -1 would be simpler and safer (for possible missing f's). > > I'm not sure that'd add to the clarity - the goal isn't to have all bits > set, the goal is to have a much larger score than could ever otherwise > be achieved so putting in a very large constant expresses that much more > directly. In that case, the best form is UINT_MAX. Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
