Re: sbxfi - What works/doesn't summary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The Source пишет:> Jason Harvey пишет:>> Takashi Iwai wrote:>>  >>>> Sorry that was a bit ambiguous, I'd never tried 96kHz.>>>> Have just changed base_rate to 96kHz and it performs identically to >>>> 48kHz.>>>> Pulse mangles the sound in just the same manner at 48kHz or 96kHz.>>>>           >>> Ah, so you meant mplayer/flash with PA backend?>>>       >> Yes.>> I also tried mplayer using -ao=alsa or -ao=oss and the sound is still >> corrupted, even after killing the pulse daemon.>>>> If I get the chance I will put the card into a 32bit machine tomorrow >> and see how it sounds there.>>>> Thanks, Jason>>>>>> _______________________________________________>> Alsa-devel mailing list>> Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel>>>>   > Ok, looks like with the latest snapshot (28.10.2008 15:19:00) > pulseaudio works fine. But wine not. The bad thing is I can't get > hw_params somehow. When pulseaudio is started hw_params always say > 'closed' even if sound is played at this moment. I'll try to remove > pulseaudio and test wine again.>Well, I wasn't lucky. Even without pulseaudio hw_params are 'closed' nomatter what._______________________________________________Alsa-devel mailing listAlsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux