At Sat, 18 Oct 2008 19:58:23 -0500,
William Pitcock wrote:
>
> This is just something that bothers me. There's no reason to accept or reject it,
> other than that it might be more informative about what hardware revision we are
> dealing with.
>
> Signed-off-by: William Pitcock <nenolod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Applied. This looks better indeed.
Takashi
>
> ---
> sound/pci/sbxfi/sbxfi.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/pci/sbxfi/sbxfi.c b/sound/pci/sbxfi/sbxfi.c
> index 30ad25b..c006278 100644
> --- a/sound/pci/sbxfi/sbxfi.c
> +++ b/sound/pci/sbxfi/sbxfi.c
> @@ -1702,10 +1702,10 @@ static int __devinit sbxfi_create_mixer(struct sbxfi *chip)
> */
>
> static char *typenames[SBXFI_HW_TYPES] = {
> - [SBXFI_HW_ORIG] = "ORIG",
> - [SBXFI_HW_055x] = "055x",
> - [SBXFI_HW_073x] = "073x",
> - [SBXFI_HW_UAA] = "UAA"
> + [SBXFI_HW_ORIG] = "SB0760",
> + [SBXFI_HW_055x] = "SB0550",
> + [SBXFI_HW_073x] = "SB0730",
> + [SBXFI_HW_UAA] = "SB0886"
> };
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> --
> 1.5.5.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Alsa-devel mailing list
> Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
