On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 10:17:51AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 07:33:47AM +0000, Ki-Seok Jo wrote: > > + enum: > > + - irondevice,sma1307a > > + - irondevice,sma1307aq > > + description: > > + If a 'q' is added, it indicated the product is AEC-Q100 > > + qualified for automotive applications. SMA1307A supports > > + both WLCSP and QFN packages. However, SMA1307AQ only > > + supports the QFN package. > Is this difference visible to software? The package is not, so that part > is irrelevant. It seems reasonable to allow it as a compatible if it's sold as a separate part, even if we don't need to care.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
