Re: Suspend/resume Issue on pcm_dmix.c in alsa-lib

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04. 09. 24 11:07, Chancel Liu wrote:
Hi Takashi,

Thanks for your reply and suggestions. Finally we have found the root cause.
Seems it's related to both drivers and alsa-lib.

When two dmix clients run in parallel we get two direct dmix instances.
1st dmix instance:
snd_pcm_dmix_open()
	snd_pcm_direct_initialize_slave()
		save_slave_setting()
Since the driver we are using has SND_PCM_INFO_RESUME flag, dmix->spcm->info
has this flag. Then this flag is cleared in dmix->shmptr->s.info.
		
2nd dmix instance:
snd_pcm_dmix_open()
	snd_pcm_direct_open_secondary_client()
		copy_slave_setting()
2nd dmix->spcm->info is copied from dmix->shmptr->s.info so it doesn' has this
flag.

If 1st dmix instance resumes firstly it should implement recovery of slave pcm
in snd_pcm_direct_slave_recover(). Because 1st dmix->spcm->info has
SND_PCM_INFO_RESUME,snd_pcm_resume(direct->spcm) can be called correctly to
resume slave pcm.

However if 2nd dmix instance resumes firstly, snd_pcm_resume(direct->spcm) will
not be called because it's spcm->info doesn't has SND_PCM_INFO_RESUME flag. The
1st dmix instance assumes someone else already did recovery so
snd_pcm_resume(direct->spcm) won't be called neither. In result the slave pcm
fails to resume.

The snd_pcm_direct_slave_recover() function should be called for both dmix instances. It calls snd_pcm_prepare() for the "driver" PCM, so the driver should recover from suspend in this case, too.

See the "some buggy drivers" comment in snd_pcm_direct_slave_recover(). It looks like a driver issue, the "resume" flag mangling is just a workaround.

SND_PCM_INFO_RESUME flag has impact on the flow of dmix resume. In my opinion
the first resumed dmix instance should make sure slave pcm can be recovered
properly no matter it's the first opened instance or secondary opened instance.
Do you know why the secondary opened instance clear the SND_PCM_INFO_RESUME
flag? Can we do the following modification?

diff --git a/src/pcm/pcm_direct.c b/src/pcm/pcm_direct.c
@@ -1183,8 +1226,6 @@ static void save_slave_setting(snd_pcm_direct_t *dmix, snd_pcm_t *spcm)
         COPY_SLAVE(buffer_time);
         COPY_SLAVE(sample_bits);
         COPY_SLAVE(frame_bits);
-
-       dmix->shmptr->s.info &= ~SND_PCM_INFO_RESUME;

Another option is to fix the buggy drivers and remove the workround (or make it configurable) from alsa-lib (revert commit 6d1d620eadf32c6d963468ce56ff52cc3a2f32e2).

						Jaroslav

--
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxxx>
Linux Sound Maintainer; ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc.




[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux