On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 06:20:34PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote: > > > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MT8188_MT6359) > > > > + const int hs_keys[] = { > > > > + SND_JACK_BTN_0, SND_JACK_BTN_2, SND_JACK_BTN_3 > > > > + }; > > > > +#else > > > > + const int hs_keys[] = { > > > > + SND_JACK_BTN_0, SND_JACK_BTN_1, SND_JACK_BTN_2 > > > > + }; > > > > +#endif > > > The support for this device was added in e794a894427b1d ("ASoC: > > > mediatek: mt8188-mt6359: add es8326 support") which was added in v6.8 > > > so this would also be a potential issue in mainline, given that this is > > > likely only used by Chromebooks and didn't make it to a LTS yet we could > > > possibly give it a go but we might have to revert. > > Because this change is to adapt mt8188-mt6359.On mt8188-mt6359, SND_JACK_BTN_2 > > corresponds to KEY_VOLUMEUP and SND_JACK_BTN_3 corresponds to KEY_VOLUMEDOWN. > > So we modified the es8326 driver to adapt the mt8188-mt6359. > > The changes we are making will not affect the application on all platforms. > If you feel that this approach may still be risky, we can solve this issue > by modifying the button about ES8326 in the machine driver of the mt8188 Yes, doing things in the machine driver would be much better. Since that machine driver supports a bunch of machines it should probably still be runtime detected even there.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature