On 27. 06. 24 16:02, Charles Keepax wrote:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 04:37:19PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:The cs42l43 has both a SPI master and an I2S interface, in some configurations 2 cs35l56 amplifiers are connected to these to provide bass speakers whilst the cs42l43's internal speaker drivers are used for the tweeters. Add UCM configuration for this type of system. Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Changes since v1: - Update control names to just "Speaker Switch/Volume" Thanks, Charles ucm2/sof-soundwire/cs35l56-bridge.conf | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ucm2/sof-soundwire/sof-soundwire.conf | 2 +- 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 ucm2/sof-soundwire/cs35l56-bridge.conf diff --git a/ucm2/sof-soundwire/cs35l56-bridge.conf b/ucm2/sof-soundwire/cs35l56-bridge.conf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dcf5e5c --- /dev/null +++ b/ucm2/sof-soundwire/cs35l56-bridge.conf @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +# Use case Configuration for sof-soundwire card + +LibraryConfig.remap.Config { + ctl.default.map { + "name='Speaker Switch'" { + "name='AMPL Speaker Switch'".vindex.0 0 + "name='AMPR Speaker Switch'".vindex.1 0 + } + "name='Speaker Volume'" { + "name='AMPL Speaker Volume'".vindex.0 0 + "name='AMPR Speaker Volume'".vindex.1 0 + } + }Turns out there is an issue here. The machine driver already creates a PIN_SWITCH control called Speaker Switch, so creating these controls will fail. How would you feel about renaming them back to something less generic?
It's not ideal, but acceptable. The non-existent ASoC naming scheme is really pain.
Jaroslav -- Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxxx> Linux Sound Maintainer; ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc.
