On Mon, 01 Jul 2024 11:26:38 -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > bitfield.h is not explicitly included but it is required for FIELD_PREP > to be expanded by the preprocessor. If it is not implicitly included, > there will be a compiler error (as seen with ARCH=hexagon allmodconfig): > > sound/soc/fsl/lpc3xxx-i2s.c:169:10: error: call to undeclared function 'FIELD_PREP'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > 169 | tmp |= LPC3XXX_I2S_WW8 | LPC3XXX_I2S_WS_HP(LPC3XXX_I2S_WW8_HP); > | ^ > sound/soc/fsl/lpc3xxx-i2s.h:42:30: note: expanded from macro 'LPC3XXX_I2S_WW8' > 42 | #define LPC3XXX_I2S_WW8 FIELD_PREP(0x3, 0) /* Word width is 8bit */ > | ^ > sound/soc/fsl/lpc3xxx-i2s.c:205:34: error: call to undeclared function 'FIELD_PREP'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > 205 | LPC3XXX_I2S_DMA1_TX_EN | LPC3XXX_I2S_DMA0_TX_DEPTH(4)); > | ^ > sound/soc/fsl/lpc3xxx-i2s.h:65:38: note: expanded from macro 'LPC3XXX_I2S_DMA0_TX_DEPTH' > 65 | #define LPC3XXX_I2S_DMA0_TX_DEPTH(s) FIELD_PREP(0xF0000, s) /* Set the DMA1 TX Request level */ > | ^ > sound/soc/fsl/lpc3xxx-i2s.c:210:34: error: call to undeclared function 'FIELD_PREP'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > 210 | LPC3XXX_I2S_DMA0_RX_EN | LPC3XXX_I2S_DMA1_RX_DEPTH(4)); > | ^ > sound/soc/fsl/lpc3xxx-i2s.h:70:38: note: expanded from macro 'LPC3XXX_I2S_DMA1_RX_DEPTH' > 70 | #define LPC3XXX_I2S_DMA1_RX_DEPTH(s) FIELD_PREP(0x700, s) /* Set the DMA1 RX Request level */ > | ^ > > [...] Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next Thanks! [1/1] ASoC: fsl: lpc3xxx-i2s: Include bitfield.h for FIELD_PREP commit: f1afb360b6f1f49e943ac85b26d4224ec67d22d3 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark
