> +struct rt1318_init_reg {
> + u32 reg;
> + u8 val;
> + u8 delay;
> +};
That looks like a 'struct reg_sequence' ?
> +static struct rt1318_init_reg init_list[] = {
> + { 0x0000C000, 0x01, 0},
> + { 0x0000F20D, 0x00, 0},
> + { 0x0000F212, 0x3E, 0},
...
> +
> +static int rt1318_reg_init(struct snd_soc_component *component)
> +{
> + struct rt1318_priv *rt1318 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < rt1318_INIT_REG_LEN; i++) {
> + regmap_write(rt1318->regmap, init_list[i].reg, init_list[i].val);
> + mdelay(init_list[i].delay);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct reg_default rt1318_reg[] = {
> + { 0xc000, 0x00 },
> + { 0xc001, 0x43 },
> + { 0xc003, 0x22 },
> + { 0xc004, 0x44 },
...
> + { 0xf20d, 0x00 },
> + { 0xf212, 0x00 },
> + { 0xf21a, 0x00 },
> + { 0xf223, 0x40 },
And this looks to me as as a set of defaults patches by a reg_sequence -
similar to what is done for rt1308 and rt1316.
Is there any opportunity to use regmap_register_patch() instead of
open-coding the loop?
