On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 09:59:40AM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>
>
> On 29/04/2024 15:54, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 04:55:32PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> > > On 23/04/2024 13:02, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 02:43:52PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> > > > > static const struct snd_soc_dapm_widget qcom_jack_snd_widgets[] = {
> > > > > SND_SOC_DAPM_HP("Headphone Jack", NULL),
> > > > > SND_SOC_DAPM_MIC("Mic Jack", NULL),
> > > > > + SND_SOC_DAPM_SPK("HDMI/DP0 Jack", NULL),
> > > > > + SND_SOC_DAPM_SPK("HDMI/DP1 Jack", NULL),
> > > > > + SND_SOC_DAPM_SPK("HDMI/DP2 Jack", NULL),
> > > >
> > > > Shouldn't these be split in dedicated HDMI and DP jacks too? What if you
> > > > have a machine with HDMI and DP jacks which would otherwise both claim
> > > > "HDMI/DP0"?
> > >
> > > These map to the Jack's added as part of qcom_snd_dp_jack_setup and
> > > belong to DISPLAY_PORT_RX_0, DISPLAY_PORT_RX_1, DISPLAY_PORT_RX_2.
> > >
> > > If its going via USB-C DP controller it will be either DP or an HDMI ?
> >
> > It will always be DP out of the machine even if an adapter can convert
> > to HDMI internally.
> >
> > The DRM ports are called "DP-1" and "DP-2" so it seems we should match
> > that.
> >
> > > This is the most common naming for the USB-C DP/HDMI jack events.
> >
> > It looks like some Intel machines use names like "HDMI/DP, pcm=%d Jack"
> > (with a pcm device number), but we also have "DP Jack". Not sure which
> > are are used with USB-C, though. (Or if the former actually support HDMI
> > altmode.)
>
> I checked this on my machine which has usb-c and I can confirm using HDMI/DP
> naming for these jack.
>
> Either way I don't mind having any names, but my point here is to be more
> consistent across.
I fear it is till not consistent. On the Intel laptop I see following
jacks:
numid=18,iface=CARD,name='HDMI/DP,pcm=3 Jack'
numid=24,iface=CARD,name='HDMI/DP,pcm=7 Jack'
numid=30,iface=CARD,name='HDMI/DP,pcm=8 Jack'
On the other hand Mediatek and RockChip use just 'DP Jack'.
I'd suggest settling on the latter option. We are closer to MTK and
RockChip rather than Intel.
BTW: a platform can easily have 4 (x1e8100) or even 8 (sc8280xp) DP
outputs. Could you please point out why there are just 3 jacks?
> --srini
> >
> > > Qualcomm LPASS in some older SoCs had a dedicated HDMI interface which
> > > is different to this one.
> > >
> > > Usual Other ways to connect HDMI is via external HDMI Bridge using I2S
> > > interface which totally different to this DP interface.
> >
> > Sure, but if there's ever a design with such a port then it will be
> > called "HDMI Jack" and then the "HDMI in "HDMI/DP0 Jack" is unnecessary
> > and confusing when it is always DP out.
> >
> > Johan
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
